PornstarsX Cricket Stats

Game Stats
Season 5: Round 8 vs Public Trust
Loss by 87 to 92 runs
Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 Season 8
Season 9 Season 10 Season 11 Season 12 Season 13 Season 14 Season 15 Season 16 Season 17
Season 18 Season 19 Season 20
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8
Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17
Game Result - Loss by 87 to 92 runs vs Public Trust
MVP for this game is Si with a net contribution of 12 runs to the team, followed by Callum (6) and Steve (5)
(MVP is calculated as Runs Scored minus Runs Conceded)

Have your say! Click here to comment on this game

Game Summary
Team Points Runs Scored Wickets Taken Extras Awarded Backnets Hit
Pornstars 1 87 12 24 3
Public Trust 7 92 10 38 3
Batting Figures
Player  Runs  Strike Rate  Outs  Backnets 4/5/7  Partnership
Dave Fellows -2 (11) -18.18 2 0/0/0 21
(14 extras)
Maverick (c) 7 (11) 63.64 1 0/0/0
OMG 17 (12) 141.67 0 0/0/0 28
(6 extras)
Si 6 (14) 42.86 1 0/0/0
Callum 18 (16) 112.5 0 2/0/0 23
(2 extras)
Steve 3 (12) 25 2 0/0/0
GMan 13 (18) 72.22 2 1/0/0 15
(2 extras)
Damo 0 (11) 0 2 0/0/0
Totals 62 (105)   10 3/0/0 87
Averages 7.75 (13.13) 54.96 1.25   21.75
Bowling Figures
Player Runs Conceded Runs Conceded Adjusted Total Wickets Extras Bowled Catches Run Outs Stumpings BackNets
Callum 12 (14) 12 (14) 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
OMG 24 (14) 24 (14) 1 14 0 1 0 0 1
GMan 11 (14) 11 (14) 2 4 0 2 0 0 1
Dave Fellows 10 (14) 10 (14) 1 6 0 0 1 0 0
Maverick (c) 19 (14) 19 (14) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Si -6 (14) -6 (14) 4 2 0 3 0 1 0
Damo 24 (14) 24 (14) 0 8 0 0 0 0 1
Steve -2 (14) -2 (14) 3 0 0 2 0 1 0
Totals 92 (112)   12 38 0 8 2 2 3
Averages 11.5 (14) 11.5 (14) 1.5 4.75 0 1 0.25 0.25 0.38
Game Comments
Maverick
9/05/2003 1:25:04 p.m.

Well chaps,,,

A loss of 5 runs when she looked to be pretty much in the bag, but we can take a bit of heart from the game.

For one, as with last week, they seemed to get away with nudging it around - not many back nets - whereas we tended to believe that knocking it out of the park was a good idea.

But credit to Paul and Simon, and Callum and Steve for grafting away to get us back in it after the start Dave and I had made. Dave - we were in business there until the last over, but a good return for you.

Also on the subject of Dave - a marvellous diving catch and a great second over - not bad for someone who has been off the pitch awhile - well done.

Steve as ever rock solid behind the stumps, getting a couple of great stumpings (Ricky was bagging me about this). I think a couple of catches were made in one of your overs and a DEFINITE, INDISPUTABLE stumping in the last over (that guy was never going to make it back...). I think Greg snatched a catch and you got a caught and bowled as well.

Callum - excellent again at the back with a couple of crucial catches off Simon's bowling.

Also on the subject of Ricky - I got a bit confused at times regarding the whole balls in an over thing - I suspect that this wasn't picked up until late in the match, but we should have had it in the bag by then. Ah well.

Simon - an excellent second over that got us right back in the match.

I haven't seen the stats yet, but I certainly know I had two extras in the first over and no wickets - so apologies for not making my targets (hopefully I can scalp a couple of Simon's wickets by the law of averages!).

All in all it was a much better performance than last week chaps, so we can take a bit of heart from that one. I was a bit disappointed in the lack of Chan's pom poms however...


Maverick
9/05/2003 1:26:48 p.m.

Well done to Damon for letting me add the comments in directly to the site...

Excellent work all round on the site Damo - for a hobby project it is all good!!!


Callum
9/05/2003 4:52:24 p.m.

Ah sod it.  I had an 8 paragraph rant all typed up and my login must have expired in the interim so when I tried to post it the page asked me to login.

Cliff's notes:  Bowled ok, batted ok, sod it.

Moral of the story: Work the sidenets if you're chasing 20 off 28, and bowl a few less extras (We gave them 38, they gave us 24).